“The Islands have a license to be Magical”- Peter Minshal
the Port of Spain Skyline from the Lady Young Road, Trinidad |
Who are we?
Who are we as a people?
as a nation…as a city?
Out of focus,
out of touch,
out of our minds to
think
that we can be all we
can be,
when who we are is
blocked and blurred
and distorted…
constricted,
restricted and stifled by
our own false
imaginings,
by our incessant
need,
that nagging voice in
our minds telling us,
pushing us, stopping
us from
realizing our own
ability, from
acknowledging the
beauty that is
Trinidadian,
Tobagonian…
Caribbean.
(i)
I took this picture randomly and didn’t think I’d
ever get to use is, because it really is terrible…no real focus, too far to
really see the city, tons of grass blocking the view… (It wasn’t a good day). However
thanks to Picasa editing J
I managed to make it into something I could use…
What do you see? What DON’T you see?
I want you to do something for me…for everyone who has
been to or know of Port of Spain: tell me the first visual image you think
about when you hear the words “Port of Spain”…GO!
Don’t worry; it’s completely natural if your answers
were along the lines of Hyatt or NAPA…I asked many people this same question…and
almost all hinted to the yellow and blue glory that is the Hyatt Regency Hotel.
Not one person said the Twin Towers…or the Queen’s
Park Savannah…or the Jean Pierre Complex…or the local paintings put up around
the city…or anything even remotely representative of Trinidadian culture.
When did our city become identifiable by foreign landmarks?
Where has our identity gone? With the manifestation of development in the form
of skyscrapers, highways and foreign franchises, I can’t help but feel like
Port of Spain should be renamed “Simon-Says-City”. I mean if we’re going to
copy everything everyone else does it makes no sense having a name we still
identify with…
(ii)
Hall and Barrett in their book Urban Geography talk about architecture
in their 8th chapter. They note Sklair (2005): “while iconic
buildings have long been used by urban elites to symbolize power and generate surplus
value from place, their current manifestation is seen as linked to the emergence
of a transnational capitalist class who has become the new drivers of
the production and representation of architectural icons”.
They describe architecture in the postmodern era to be
intricately linked to economic and political agendas and dynamics within a
city. What does the architectural structure of Port of Spain’s skyline tell you
about the power play within the city? The hidden Twin Towers versus the massive
spectacle of Hyatt Regency on the water front? Trinidad’s Urban Development
Corporation (UDeCOTT) describes the Hyatt as “a
beacon in the nation's capital”. What can the
Twin Towers be described as? I feel like we’re so willing to find new, exotic
ways to develop the city based on foreign ideals that we’re forgetting what we
have, and what of our own can still be developed. Does development demand the
shift away from the local? If so, can this really be seen as development…
The Port of Spain Skyline ...what is the focus of architectural change?? |
The Twin Towers peeking out from behind the Hyatt Regency Hotel Note the caption "Amazing Trinidad Vacations" Trinidad Vacations..and they show the Hyatt...with a sliver of the Twin Towers |
Hall and Barrett allude to in Ch. 9: Images of the City, that in terms of the representation of cities, often times may physically change in form and 'look' to portray a more appealing side or elicit different emotions from viewers.
Harvey (1988) notes that “the enhancement of urban
image and the associated physical transformation of many city centre landscapes
through urban planning and regeneration projects, have been labeling the ‘carnival
mask’ of the late capitalist urbanization, the criticism being that while such
city images create the impression of regeneration, change and vibrancy they do little,
if anything to address underlying social and economic change that necessitated regeneration
in the first place…”
I find this quote quite important and thought
provoking in that it really strikes at the façade put on by cities. Governments
talk about development of the city, development of the infrastructure, of the
buildings, of the ‘look’ of the city…what about the internals of the city? The people,
the relations, the conflicts, the power dynamics….is water front development and
national art academies helping in this sense? In my opinion all these projects
are doing in further segregating and isolating portions of our society, while
in the same breath uplifting the already prosperous sectors.
Port of Spain in my opinions doesn't need a face lift…it needs a
priority-check…something to refocus our
sense of self…a reminder of who we are, of where we are, and most importantly where
we came from…you want expensive glass and metal and shiny material? Sure, if that’s
what it takes to be recognized then so be it, but don’t build a foreign enterprise,
or skyscrapers that overshadow everything local. Use that shiny material and
enhance what is already ours! Just as the Eiffel Tower is Paris, the Empire
State Building is New York and the Big Ben is London…the Twin Towers is Port of Spain. This can only happen though,
if we can actually see it amidst the chaos and drama that is the Urban….
The Twin Towers- Trinidad |
The Big Ben |
The Empire State Building |
The Eiffel Tower |
This week’s entry is titled with a quote from Peter
Minshall, which I got when I attended a lecture he held last week at the UWI, St. Augustine. He said this line so many times in his talk
that it was hard to forget. Over and over he said “highways are nice,
skyscrapers are amazing…but NOT HERE…leave that for New York”. And I agree…I
agree that we need to slow down, we need to take a step back from this
obsession, this never ending game of catch-up we “developing nations” love to
play…so much so that we lose ourselves, our true identities in the imaginary
race to “developed nation status”. Think about it…
Peter Minshall Dynamic, Mesmerizing, Talented A Cultural Icon of Trinidad |
One of Minshall's first costume designs in Trinidad: The Hummingbird |
(iii) Just a few links for you to check out:
1. The UDeCOTT Website for further development plans for
Trinidad…How many of those will actually do what they claim in terms of
fostering Trinidad’s development (on the inside and on the outside)?
The first thing thought of when I hear Port-of-Spain is usually the buildings(the twin towers in particular). Amazing content yet again ..I really like your link to architecture and culture.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad you thought about the twin towers actually, even I'm guilty of forgetting them as they get lost in the clutter of new development plans...thanks for reading and for the positive feedback :)
DeleteWow, the sky line really has changed!
ReplyDeleteI am curious to know: Does your class address specific ways that development can occur while staying true to the original landscape? I know you mentioned using the new materials to enhance what is already there but I was wondering what that actually means... (or is this a question for an architecture course?)
hey! Thanks for reading! Actually, the chapter we did on architecture didn't really go too much in depth on the topic of maintaining original cultures and landscape, more about the changing face of architecture ie away from necessity and function toward more statement-piece buildings...i feel like the point about incorporating the local into development isn't addressed as much, as I guess it's not seen as necessary...
Delete"The islands have a license to be magical" Peter Minshall (The Masman)I really enjoy reading your blogs, this one in particular is quite simpatico(english words can't describe it better at the moment, for me i.e. You are right my answer was the waterfront.
ReplyDeleteYou touched on an issue that has been our thorn in the side ever since Trueman (in 1952 I think), labelled the former European colonies as 'undeveloped' and told us that we should be 'developed'.
'Who am I?' is a question we often try to answer, it is the same for us as a people. The Caribbean is always struggling to define itself, we always look at the so-called developed nations and try to be like them. What we often forget is that we were never like them and should never be. Our origins are very different, therefore our development should be. European development was built on the blood, sweat and tears of the colonies, unlike them we have no one to exploit.
Developing a city is an issue I never really gave much thought to. Hence, when you asked questions of architecture vs people, it provoked thoughts that, before reading your blogs I never considered pondering. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
you comments always make my day :) I'm glad that the entries are getting you to think about new concepts and the discourse that is development :)
DeleteDevelopment or "photocopyment"? Enjoyable read. Anything that provokes my thoughts like this and wakes me up from intended sleep is deserving of a comment. That lecture was truly inspiring and very applicable in your study. Thanks
ReplyDeletethanks so much for reading, I'm really happy for your feedback.."photocopyment"- very clever and exactly what I was trying to portray....there's an entry earlier on about the emergence of cultural industries, I'd like to hear your thoughts on it :)
DeleteReally good read Hannah and Simeon's comment said it all for me so I'll just say, thanks for another entertaining post. Its nice to read something other than that pertaining to my degree and at the same time provokes my thoughts on what our nation's capital has become.
ReplyDeletethanks alot! :) i posted the one for this week on Kendall's wall lol but I guess I should be posting on yours :P I hope you keep reading!
DeleteI thought of Charlotte Street.
ReplyDeletePlace identity, heritage, and architectural form?
So... what is magical in POS?